This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 13, 2019. It is now read-only.

need association types #15

Open

mellybelly opened this issue Feb 9, 2016 · 0 comments

mellybelly commented Feb 9, 2016

such as "is causal for", "has been associated with", "is protective for" etc.
Need to define these.

see also monarch-initiative/dipper#195

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.