Open Page

[allikah1]

I am concerned about this not full information in the Directory.
Could we have a scale - Peppol directory contains information of 7578 (exact number) of 75000 participants in Peppol (count in SML).

[phax]

In general a very good idea, but I wouldn't do it, unless we have a reasonable number of participants contained - otherwise "having 27 of 76123" doesn't look so good ;-)

[allikah1]

In principal agree but we shouldn't be secret that we have little representativeness as when you start to search for you found nobody or when you download excel with 27 records - the story is the same.
I would see this as pressure to SMP-s maybe we could even namely publish which SMP's have done the integration :)

[phax]

That does sound reasonable. But than we also need to say "Having entries from x of y SMPs" by counting the DNS publisher entries in the SML...
But we do have a problem with the data quality, because the SML already contains some dead entries (both SMP and AP)

[clancger]

I think publishing the SMP names will mean little other than to the operators of those SMPs themselves.
Even if an SMP supports PD, it's up to the APs to collect the data and make available for indexing.
More interesting would be a list of the APs that are supporting PD. If an AP wants the PD capability, then they will either have to add, if they operate an SMP, or pressure their SMP provider if not.

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[phax]

The special certificate for communication with the SML would be needed