We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This would also be required for extension ranges.
Documentation on how it can be used: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/proto2-spec#extensions
Also note, that multiple "x to y" interval ranges can be declared: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/proto#reserved_values (which is supported today according to the tests).
Additionally, upon inspection of this class, this should be changed to use rangeClosed instead of range: https://github.com/perezd/protopoet/blob/master/java/protopoet/FieldRange.java#L48
Presumably we'll use Integer.MAX_VALUE to signal "max" and so that'll break as it is today if we do.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
This would also be required for extension ranges.
Documentation on how it can be used:
https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/proto2-spec#extensions
Also note, that multiple "x to y" interval ranges can be declared: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/proto#reserved_values (which is supported today according to the tests).
Additionally, upon inspection of this class, this should be changed to use rangeClosed instead of range:
https://github.com/perezd/protopoet/blob/master/java/protopoet/FieldRange.java#L48
Presumably we'll use Integer.MAX_VALUE to signal "max" and so that'll break as it is today if we do.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: