-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 168
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question about kallisto indexes #435
Comments
You can use the prebuilt indices (they contain lncRNA targets and kb ref uses “kallisto index” under the hood anyway). However, if you use those, make sure you’re using the latest version of kallisto (0.50.1). |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello,
I was wondering if it is more appropriate to use the v1 standard kallisto index https://github.com/pachterlab/kallisto-transcriptome-indices/releases for bulk RNA seq data compared to an index created by concatenating Mus_musculus.GRCm39.cdna.all.fa.gz Mus_musculus.GRCm39.ncrna.fa.gz and then using kallisto index on that file.
I know the v1 kallisto index was created using kb ref but I am not using kb ref for alignment. The command that I will be using to align will be kallisto quant -i mousecdna_ncrna -o mouse_kallisto/MTKO5 -t 4 --rf-stranded MTKO5_R1_001.fastq.gz MTKO5_R2_001.fastq.gz
I am interesting in lncRNAs for my project.
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: