Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Think about ways to "share" configuration #51

Open
sschuberth opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Think about ways to "share" configuration #51

sschuberth opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@sschuberth
Copy link
Member

When browsing a result with the workbench, the local configuration (like package configurations) is applied. This might not be what the user expects when trying to reproduce results from an ORT run in CI which might use a different configuration.

Some rough orthogonal ideas how to address that:

  • Make in easy in the work bench to use another (remote) configuration (repository).
  • Really "bake" all configuration into the regular ORT result.
  • Allow the workbench to only load a "special" report format similar to the current evaluated model report format (but created in a much more sane way, which Jackson indices etc.) which contains all required information. Such a report format could also use a dedicated file extension that could be associated to the workbench, so that double-clicking on such a file opens it up directly in the workbench.
@sschuberth sschuberth added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 10, 2022
@mnonnenmacher
Copy link
Member

mnonnenmacher commented Dec 29, 2022

My prefered solution to this would be to wait until oss-review-toolkit/ort#6188 (comment) is implemented and then add an option to the workbench to use only the configuration (curations, package configurations, ...) contained in the loaded OrtResult file.

@mnonnenmacher mnonnenmacher added this to the 1.0 milestone Dec 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants