Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Although your suggestion may seem relevant, but personally I would prefer to see MuseScore and its components, including Muse Sounds, which are free. And StaffPad is a paid software. Thus (in my opinion) the Muse Sounds team may stop paying attention to their brainchild if it becomes possible to buy paid VST. Although I sincerely hope that this will not happen, both MuseScore Studio and Muse Sounds will continue to be free. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
These two aforementioned things bother me. If they implement the purchase and use of advanced third-party VST plugins in MuseScore Studio (by the way, we should also remember about Note Performer at the same time), then they may stop improving the existing Muse Sounds. Bugs and flaws (including those described by @dcorson-ticino-com in the now-closed issue) will accumulate, and the Muse team will not pay much attention to them. Indeed, why, if there are paid advanced VST. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Your idea
The idea would be to introduce good sampled libraries from various retailers and developers like VSL, Orchestral Tools, Spitfire, etc, the same way it is designed in StaffPad. I think this inclusion would approach MuseScore and StaffPad by design. MuseScore would still be free but the samples bought separately
Problem to be solved
It would give professional tier playback beyond comparison of what MuseSounds can offer at the moment, and quality playback.
Prior art
No response
Additional context
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions