Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

parallel_tool_calls is missing from generated code #31

Closed
algunion opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #56
Closed

parallel_tool_calls is missing from generated code #31

algunion opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #56

Comments

@algunion
Copy link

algunion commented Jun 10, 2024

The parallel_tool_calls parameter is included in the official documentation and the specification file.

However, the code generation seems to omit this parameter altogether.

Since the parameter is set to true by default, specific scenarios are less predictable when using function tool calling (e.g., even if only one tool is present, the output can result in the same tool call being repeated with different parameters - which is not always desirable).

@trrwilson
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you, @algunion!

You're quite correct, and it'll be added soon. The input specification for the initial preview release was frozen to d376fedb to fully validate stability -- prior to the changes last week -- and that means parallel_tool_calls and chunking_strategy for vector stores aren't yet represented.

We're working to reduce this latency to as near to simultaneous with the spec as possible and will continue to rapidly update.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants