Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: only emit value when control is valid #183

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lothern
Copy link

@lothern lothern commented Aug 30, 2023

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

[ ] Bugfix
[x] Feature
[ ] Code style update (formatting, local variables)
[ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
[ ] Build related changes
[ ] CI related changes
[x] Documentation content changes
[ ] Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

#182

Issue Number: 182

What is the new behavior?

New property called validValue$ that only emits when a value is valid.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

[ ] Yes
[x] No

Other information

@stackblitz
Copy link

stackblitz bot commented Aug 30, 2023

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@@ -1,17 +1,14 @@
name: '@ngneat/reactive-forms'
name: 'lothern/reactive-forms'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, those changes weren't supposed to make it into the master branch. I've corrected it.


on:
workflow_dispatch:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The entire code uses lothern?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, those changes weren't supposed to make it into the master branch. I've corrected it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants