Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider increasing Channel Name field size #2135

Open
rbeckman-nextgen opened this issue May 11, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Consider increasing Channel Name field size #2135

rbeckman-nextgen opened this issue May 11, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@rbeckman-nextgen
Copy link
Collaborator

Would you consider increasing the field size of the Channel Name field above the current varchar(40), e.g. 60 or even 255?

Imported Issue. Original Details:
Jira Issue Key: MIRTH-2191
Reporter: yorkie
Created: 2012-07-17T06:33:01.000-0700

@rbeckman-nextgen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This would be really useful for us also. Channel groupings have helped to an extent, but it seems like a relatively minor change to increase the length of the channel name field.

Imported Comment. Original Details:
Author: seaston
Created: 2016-06-16T14:33:25.000-0700

@rbeckman-nextgen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This would be very useful for us as well. There are often times when 40 characters just isn't long enough to differentiate channels in a meaningful way, especially without the use of any non-alphanumeric characters such as parentheses, brackets, or braces. Tagging is helpful in some ways, but there are many situations (alerts, for example) where tags aren't relevant and it would be helpful to have longer, more descriptive channel names.

Imported Comment. Original Details:
Author: jridderhoff
Created: 2019-11-22T07:47:59.000-0800

@cturczynskyj cturczynskyj added the closed-due-to-inactivity This is being closed due to age. If this is still an issue, comment and we can reopen. label Mar 1, 2021
@pladesma pladesma closed this as completed Mar 1, 2021
@ChristopherSchultz
Copy link
Contributor

Please re-open if possible. 40 characters just isn't enough for a lot of applications.

@pacmano1 pacmano1 reopened this Sep 19, 2022
@tonygermano tonygermano removed the closed-due-to-inactivity This is being closed due to age. If this is still an issue, comment and we can reopen. label Sep 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants