Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wiki: Using firejail from git #3443

Closed
rusty-snake opened this issue Jun 2, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Wiki: Using firejail from git #3443

rusty-snake opened this issue Jun 2, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
wiki Discussions about the wiki

Comments

@rusty-snake
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue for discussions about https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/wiki/Using-firejail-from-git.

@rusty-snake rusty-snake added the wiki Discussions about the wiki label Jun 2, 2020
@glitsj16
Copy link
Collaborator

glitsj16 commented Jun 5, 2020

I added a routine to the Debian/Ubuntu section referring to our update_deb.sh script from contrib and opened #3450 for review. As mentioned there I don't exactly know how to patch firejail.config to accomodate https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916920. Or even whether we want that. Would be nice to get input on how to best proceed on the latter.

@curiosityseeker
Copy link
Collaborator

I added some more configuration options.

@rusty-snake
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sudo sed -i 's/# force-nonewprivs no/force-nonewprivs yes/' /etc/firejail/firejail.config

  1. We could add more (restrict-network, ...)
  2. We should add a warning that make install overrides /etc/firejail/firejail.config.

@glitsj16
Copy link
Collaborator

glitsj16 commented Jun 5, 2020

I added the warning for (2) cfr. @rusty-snake's suggestion.

@rusty-snake rusty-snake changed the title Using firejail from git Wiki: Using firejail from git Aug 4, 2021
@rusty-snake
Copy link
Collaborator Author

#4450

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
wiki Discussions about the wiki
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants