You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not sure if it is intended behaviour, but setting noroot as an option will remove all of the user's groups, regardless of whether nogroups is present or not. Right now, I had to configure the profile of a program to ignore both nogroups and noroot, but I could have done away ignoring only nogroups: I need some of my user's groups, but I don't need the program knowing about the existence of users other than mine, including root.
Could noroot be implemented in such a way that it does not overlap with nogroups, so I can set them both independently, or does noroot necessarily require the removal of other groups?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
$ groups
rusty-snake wheel games wireshark
$ firejail --noprofile groups
rusty-snake wheel games wireshark
$ firejail --noprofile --nogroups groups
rusty-snake
$ firejail --noprofile --noroot groups
rusty-snake games
😕 , there are exceptions for tty, audio, video, games.
I'm not sure if it is intended behaviour, but setting
noroot
as an option will remove all of the user's groups, regardless of whethernogroups
is present or not. Right now, I had to configure the profile of a program to ignore bothnogroups
andnoroot
, but I could have done away ignoring onlynogroups
: I need some of my user's groups, but I don't need the program knowing about the existence of users other than mine, including root.Could
noroot
be implemented in such a way that it does not overlap withnogroups
, so I can set them both independently, or doesnoroot
necessarily require the removal of other groups?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: