-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
how bonito normalize raw signals when save-ctc #374
Comments
Hi @xieyy46 most commonly, normalization happens per read using |
I was thinking about normalization a bit. In particular, I was thinking about a very naive model of the five bases in a pore, as five resistors connected in series. I'm sure the pore is more complicated than this, but it's a simple model. With that (admittedly way oversimplified) model, the resistance of all five is just the sum, and so a linear function. So, you could use the assumed voltage, and convert from pA to pico-ohms or nano-ohms. I'm wondering if this might be slightly easier for the NN to parse? I realize that the NN can model all sorts of nonlinear things, and I wouldn't expect a large improvement. But it seems like a (relatively) small software-only thing to try (although no doubt complicated). |
Hi bonito team!
I want to know how bonito normalize raw signals! I noticed that in the chunks.npy, the signal seem to be normalized to (-1, 1). Does bonito normalize raw signals in per chunk level? or per level? or per run level?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: