Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MU4 Issue] Arrows on arpeggios do not connect with squiggle (Bravura) #9306

Open
Nick-Mazuk opened this issue Sep 27, 2021 · 1 comment
Open
Assignees
Labels
engraving P2 Priority: Medium

Comments

@Nick-Mazuk
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the bug

When using Bravura, an arpeggio arrow and squiggle don't line up perfectly. Perhaps the code to draw the arpeggio doesn't account for the repeat offset?

Screen Shot 2021-09-27 at 2 26 59 PM

Expected behavior

The squiggle and the arrow should seamlessly line up, just like all the other fonts. For instance, this is how Leland looks:

Screen Shot 2021-09-27 at 2 27 23 PM

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: macOS 11.6
@oktophonie oktophonie added this to To do in [MU4.0 - ENGRAVING] via automation Sep 28, 2021
@Tantacrul
Copy link
Contributor

@oktophonie - is this one for 4.0 or 4.x?

@oktophonie oktophonie added this to To do in 4.x LONGLIST via automation May 3, 2022
[MU4.0 - ENGRAVING] automation moved this from To do to Done May 3, 2022
4.x LONGLIST automation moved this from To do to Requests May 3, 2022
@oktophonie oktophonie removed this from Requests in 4.x LONGLIST Jun 13, 2023
@oktophonie oktophonie added this to To do in 4.x LONGLIST via automation Jun 13, 2023
@oktophonie oktophonie added P2 Priority: Medium engraving labels Jun 13, 2023
@oktophonie oktophonie reopened this Jun 13, 2023
4.x LONGLIST automation moved this from To do to In progress Jun 13, 2023
@oktophonie oktophonie moved this from In progress to To do in 4.x LONGLIST Jun 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
engraving P2 Priority: Medium
Projects
Status: In the further future
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants