-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bell Tree and Mark Tree arpeggio UX / Engraving improvement #21326
Comments
@oktophonie would be good to discuss the feasibility of this. |
To take this a step further, both the arpeggio and gliss notations should be supported and easy to input. Here is an example of users being unsure how to use the mark tree https://musescore.org/en/node/339035#comment-1230239 |
Let me express my opinion on this issue. Instruments such as Bell Tree, Wind Chimes and Mark Tree, although they do not have a definite pitch, but they have a considerable inharmonious spectrum, which suggests that in notation for these instruments it makes sense to resort to the use of approximate pitch notation. Below I will express my point of view, which seems to me the most suitable for solving this issue.
That's all for now. I really hope that my comment will be taken into account and not deleted (as usual). |
Your idea
When attaching an arpeggio to a single note, perhaps the arpeggio should be the same minimum height as the beam.
Problem to be solved
There are a few different ways to notate for instruments like bell tree and mark tree.
MuseScore has these instruments set to a single line staff
Muse Sounds has the ability to play back a gliss up and gliss down with the appropriate arpeggio symbol attached.
When attaching a arpeggio to a single note, the argeggio is the height of the notehead
Prior art
Additional context
Example from a score
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: