Duplicates

• I have searched the existing issues

Latest version

• I have tested the latest version

Current behavior 😯

When using the Arrow keys, the new active cell is not visible

https://master--material-ui-x.netlify.app/components/data-grid/#commercial-version

Expected behavior 🤔

When using the Arrow keys, the new active cell should be visible (scroll if necessary).

https://0.0.0.0:3001/components/data-grid/#commercial-version

with

diff --git a/packages/grid/x-data-grid/src/components/cell/GridCell.tsx b/packages/grid/x-data-grid/src/components/cell/GridCell.tsx
index 710c9577..bc983146 100644
--- a/packages/grid/x-data-grid/src/components/cell/GridCell.tsx
+++ b/packages/grid/x-data-grid/src/components/cell/GridCell.tsx
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ function GridCell(props: GridCellProps) {
       const elementToFocus = focusableElement || cellRef.current;

       if (doesSupportPreventScroll()) {
-        elementToFocus.focus({ preventScroll: true });
+        elementToFocus.focus();
       } else {
         const scrollPosition = apiRef.current.getScrollPosition();
         elementToFocus.focus();

We can also see it behave correctly on the first demo of https://www.ag-grid.com/.

Steps to reproduce 🕹

Steps:

1. Open https://master--material-ui-x.netlify.app/components/data-grid/#commercial-version
2. Follow the previous videos

Context 🔦

It's a regression introduced in #2999 with the objective to fix #2508. I have found this by looking into #4280 in more detail. cc @m4theushw

• First, in [DataGrid] Prevent scroll when selecting rows #2999 I have never seen a valid use case for using preventScroll so I'm always dubious when I see it.
• Secondly, in [question] Issue with jumping x-grid starting from alpha.37 #2508 I would read the root problem as .focus is called when it shouldn't be called. Why is it called too often? Maybe because we use React.useLayoutEffect or because its dependencies change when they shouldn't.

I have tested it again #2508 (comment). It seems that the root problem in #2508 was solved closer to the root later on (I suspect in #3718). Therefore we could revert #2999 to fix this GitHub issue with no downsides.

Your environment 🌎

MUI X v5.7.0.

Order ID 💳 (optional)

No response