Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consider ways to interpret N-to-1 mappings #17

Closed
kingmanzhang opened this issue Jan 9, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

consider ways to interpret N-to-1 mappings #17

kingmanzhang opened this issue Jan 9, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@kingmanzhang
Copy link
Member

There are two situations, 1) various tests with different accuracy for one phenotype 2) multiple time points for one phenotype (glucose tolerance test). Maybe using probabilities? e.g. 1.0 for yes/no tests, 1.0/N if there are N tests for one phenotype?

@pnrobinson
Copy link
Member

For some of the tests there are more detailed interpretations, and in many cases one will order follow up tests to confirm a finding. It will not be possible to achieve 100% accuracy with mapping LOINC codes to what the patient "truly" had. I would suggest for the first approach that if one or more test of an N-to-1 mapping is abnormal, then the abnormal HPO code should be called. But let's keep this in mind!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants