-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
consider ways to interpret N-to-1 mappings #17
Comments
For some of the tests there are more detailed interpretations, and in many cases one will order follow up tests to confirm a finding. It will not be possible to achieve 100% accuracy with mapping LOINC codes to what the patient "truly" had. I would suggest for the first approach that if one or more test of an N-to-1 mapping is abnormal, then the abnormal HPO code should be called. But let's keep this in mind! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
There are two situations, 1) various tests with different accuracy for one phenotype 2) multiple time points for one phenotype (glucose tolerance test). Maybe using probabilities? e.g. 1.0 for yes/no tests, 1.0/N if there are N tests for one phenotype?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: