-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
what should be the reference NFFT backend #19
Labels
nufft-backend
Issues regarding NUFFT backend support
Comments
👋 PyNFFT author here Indeed, I wrote the package a while back but the engagement around it has faded. Feel free to submit a patch for Cython 3.0 if you succeed in making it work with it. It's okay if you find an alternative implementation which performs better and is actively maintained. Best regards from a fellow Inria engineer. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently we are using pyNFFT as the reference backend to check the fidely of the other supported backend.
This result from a speed/precision compromise, because comparing all backends to the NDFT would be expensive
However this causes some troubles:
NDFT/NFFT/another_backend
introduce more imprecision.An alternative would be to use finufft as the reference implementation, as they have prime support for python bindings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: