Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The NUFFTadjoint result is very different from that of irt by jeff fessler in scale #133

Open
Michaelsqj opened this issue Nov 7, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@Michaelsqj
Copy link

Dear sigpy developers,

I had some NUFFT code written using irt by jeff fessler, and I was hoping to migrate to sigpy. However I found the results are quite different, even in absolute scales.

% ktraj: [Npts,3]
% kd: [Npts]
st   =   nufft_init(ktraj,...
                          im_size,...
                          [6,6,6],...
                          im_size*2,...
                          im_size/2);
dd = nufft_adj(kd, st);

and the python script

coords=ktraj/np.pi/2*im_size
dd = sp.nufft_adjoint(kd, coords, oshape=im_size)

the sum of square for dd reconstructed using irt nufft_adj was 5.5726e+06, whereas that reconstructed by sigpy was 1.0250025.

May I ask do you have idea what causes the scale difference?

Yours,
Qijia

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant