Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add your package to the list of socialite providers #8

Closed
Fluxlicious opened this issue Nov 13, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Add your package to the list of socialite providers #8

Fluxlicious opened this issue Nov 13, 2019 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Fluxlicious
Copy link

There's a nice list of all Socialite providers, might be usefull if your package was listed.
See https://socialiteproviders.netlify.com/contribute.html

@mikebronner mikebronner self-assigned this Mar 1, 2020
@mikebronner mikebronner added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 1, 2020
@mikebronner
Copy link
Owner

@Fluxlicious Thanks for the suggestion. :)

@vonec
Copy link

vonec commented Apr 21, 2020

why do we need ruby :-/ cant we do that as a scheduled job on laravel? also please add to socialite providers :)

@mikebronner
Copy link
Owner

Hi @vonec, Ruby was the easiest way for me to create a JWT token for the Apple services. If you know another way, feel free to use that. It is not needed for the app, only for the configuration process.

@mikebronner
Copy link
Owner

@Fluxlicious @vonec Unfortunately this package is not compatible with how the Sociality Providers repo works as it is using customized functionality that they can't support.

@alinmiron
Copy link

alinmiron commented Apr 22, 2020

why do we need ruby :-/ cant we do that as a scheduled job on laravel? also please add to socialite providers :)

@vonec maybe this can help: laravel/socialite#369 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants