Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

try sending with tx checksum offload #4587

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

mtfriesen
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Describe the purpose of and changes within this Pull Request.

Testing

Do any existing tests cover this change? Are new tests needed?

Documentation

Is there any documentation impact for this change?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.79%. Comparing base (eb76333) to head (ab915dd).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4587      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.04%   86.79%   -0.25%     
==========================================
  Files          56       56              
  Lines       17354    17354              
==========================================
- Hits        15106    15063      -43     
- Misses       2248     2291      +43     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
{
"installer": "https://github.com/microsoft/xdp-for-windows/releases/download/v1.0.1/xdp-for-windows.1.0.1.msi"
"installer": "https://github.com/microsoft/xdp-for-windows/releases/download/v1.1.0%2B5421c3c5/xdp-for-windows.1.1.0-prerelease+cfc4e4dd.msi"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A thought I had: How will MsQuic require the XDP version that supports the new offloads in the future? Should we rely on API version, or is there a way to require a specific XDP driver version?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you should try loading the highest api versions, falling back gracefully, if a new API version is introduced. for some features, socket options will be added and shouldn't require an API version change

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants