Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Work on ufunc modes #159

Closed
3 tasks
mhostetter opened this issue Aug 2, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed
3 tasks

Work on ufunc modes #159

mhostetter opened this issue Aug 2, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@mhostetter
Copy link
Owner

mhostetter commented Aug 2, 2021 •
edited
Loading

  • Make the default GF(2) ufunc mode "jit-lookup" even though most arithmetic is optimized for calculation
  • Consider allowing "python-calculate" for small fields
  • Consider renaming compile modes to "lookup", "calculate", and "python".
@mhostetter mhostetter added this to the Release 0.1.0 milestone Aug 5, 2021
@mhostetter mhostetter linked a pull request Aug 8, 2021 that will close this issue
Additional unit testing review #169
Merged
@mhostetter mhostetter removed a link to a pull request Aug 9, 2021
Additional unit testing review #169
Merged
@mhostetter mhostetter linked a pull request Aug 20, 2021 that will close this issue
Clean-up Galois field array code and tests #173
Merged
@mhostetter mhostetter removed a link to a pull request Aug 24, 2021
Clean-up Galois field array code and tests #173
Merged
@mhostetter mhostetter removed this from the Release 0.1.0 milestone Nov 13, 2022
@mhostetter
Copy link
Owner Author

Work on this when implementing #128.

@mhostetter
Copy link
Owner Author

Make the default GF(2) ufunc mode "jit-lookup" even though most arithmetic is optimized for calculation

Not sure this is a good idea.

Consider allowing "python-calculate" for small fields

Added in #551

Consider renaming compile modes to "lookup", "calculate", and "python".

Not sure about this either.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mhostetter