-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature: Debian package #86
Comments
Hi! I agree that it would be nice to have a Debian package. However, I have no experience with creating those, and right now my main distro is not Debian-based, so I'm probably not the one who should do it. If a package becomes available, I'm happy to accept a PR that adds it to the list of installation methods in the README. |
That would be a decent step towards packaging for Debian, but I'm not sure about putting package manager-specific files in the releases page (like we don't have the homebrew / nix / scoop etc packages there either). How much extra work would it be to put such a .deb to the Debian package repository? |
Hey, sorry for the late reply.
I see your point. However, I still think it would be easier for Debian users to just download and install
I'm not very familiar with Debian packaging guidelines but I know that it has some procedures. Maybe someone with more experience can elaborate. |
I have no experience with Debian packaging, but I got curious when I read about I created a fork https://github.com/bauerei/tere to handle all things related to Debian packaging. A Unfortunately I don't know anything about how to get it into the official Debian repos, but maybe this will help a bit. Let me know what you think! |
This would be made much easier to install if a Debian package was available to install with apt.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: