Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UUID as requirement for resource ids necessary? #4262

Open
skomski opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

UUID as requirement for resource ids necessary? #4262

skomski opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@skomski
Copy link

skomski commented Mar 27, 2024

Is it necessary to restrain resource ids to UUIDs? The FHIR spec is much broader: (http:https://hl7.org/fhir/R4/datatypes.html#id)

Any combination of upper- or lower-case ASCII letters ('A'..'Z', and 'a'..'z', numerals ('0'..'9'), '-' and '.', with a length limit of 64 characters. (This might be an integer, an un-prefixed OID, UUID or any other identifier pattern that meets these constraints.)

if (!validator.isUUID(id)) {

For example we want to use for some resources OIDs.

@codyebberson
Copy link
Member

Hi @skomski - Currently the UUID is a requirement. We have plans to support the full ID spec via client assigned IDs. You can see the discussion here: #1175

@codyebberson codyebberson added this to the Milestone Quality milestone Apr 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants