Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NP network #2

Open
sndler opened this issue Oct 30, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

NP network #2

sndler opened this issue Oct 30, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@sndler
Copy link

sndler commented Oct 30, 2017

I have an issue about the No pairwise baseline
I think it is not similar to Social LSTM, the Sum operation doesn't preserve the spatial information
I wonder why NP network works?
Thank you very much

@mbchang
Copy link
Owner

mbchang commented Oct 30, 2017

Hi, while the Social LSTM does preserve some spatial information, it loses spatial information through the social pooling operation (for neighbors within a certain spatial distance). Similarly, the No-Pairwise baseline sums together the contributions of the neighbors within a certain spatial distance from the focus object without preserving the spatial information. As you can see from our simulation videos (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxCJLi4FnT_6QW4tcF94d1doLWs), the NP does not perform nearly as well as the NPE.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants