Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend Converters to cover more Object types #44

Open
lviggiano opened this issue Jul 21, 2013 · 1 comment
Open

Extend Converters to cover more Object types #44

lviggiano opened this issue Jul 21, 2013 · 1 comment

Comments

@lviggiano
Copy link
Collaborator

At the moment the converters are able to instantiate objects having a single parameter constructor accepting a String or Object. But since the Converter itself is able to convert String to primitive (and non-primitive) types, it should not be difficult to extend it to cover Object with a single parameter constructor accepting any type already covered by the Converters.

@drapostolos
Copy link
Contributor

This is solved in pull request #83

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants