-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 969
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mastodon server migration docs do not include redis #1127
Comments
Is this something we're considering including? I'd be happy to write the PR for this. |
Ah sorry, it seems it has been included in the docs nowadays! It is fixed by #1390 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
(Originally posted on the mastodon/mastodon git repo: mastodon/mastodon#22556)
Pitch
Currently, if you're following the mastodon docs on migrating to a new server you're not migrating your redis database.
(https://docs.joinmastodon.org/admin/migrating/)
This however results in temporarily having reduced features. The two most prominent issues I'm seeing right after my migration:
The active users is a bit annoying, but doesn't necessarily reduce functionality for those already registered, but no longer having the amount of posts in a certain hashtag be accurate can be quite annoying. It also means we're skipping over trends that might have been very popular 24 hours ago, but are not seeing much action at the moment.
If I had to do another migration, I'd absolutely consider moving my redis over. Another solution would be (at least for the active user count) to have a way to re-calculate this manually instead of waiting for the next cron
Motivation
Both users and server admins will benefit from this, right now my instance will look like a ghost town for people who pass by. No one wants to register on an instance that looks like it has "0 active users" followed by trends that list only covering 3 posts (suggesting bad federation)
Other then it scaring off new users, it also makes trends temporarily inaccurate which is inconvenient for users.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: