You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, I am reproducing the above example.
When calculating J with the same input obtained using VASP+wannier90, using the value of 4.327, which was originally at getJ.sh, results well, but using 4.5075, a fermi enengy from VASP OUTPUT, results in very strange results.
Even if I change the input, the result changes depending on how the fermi energy is set regardless of the input data, so I want to know if you can explain this situation.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
https://github.com/mailhexu/TB2J_examples/tree/master/Wannier/SrMnO3_VASP_Wannier
Currently, I am reproducing the above example.
When calculating J with the same input obtained using VASP+wannier90, using the value of 4.327, which was originally at getJ.sh, results well, but using 4.5075, a fermi enengy from VASP OUTPUT, results in very strange results.
Even if I change the input, the result changes depending on how the fermi energy is set regardless of the input data, so I want to know if you can explain this situation.
exchange(E_f=4.5075).txt
exchange(E_f=4.327).txt
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions