mousepad: Update to 0.6.2

[qwertychouskie]

Description

Updates Mousepad to 0.6.2, enabling GTK3 in the process.

Type(s)

• bugfix
• enhancement
• security fix

Tested on

macOS 14.4.1 23E224 arm64
Xcode 15.3 15E204a

Verification

Have you

• followed our Commit Message Guidelines?
• squashed and minimized your commits?
• checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same change?
• referenced existing tickets on Trac with full URL in commit message?
• checked your Portfile with port lint --nitpick?
• tried existing tests with sudo port test?
• tried a full install with sudo port -vst install?
• tested basic functionality of all binary files?
• checked that the Portfile's most important variants haven't been broken?

[qwertychouskie]

The build error is https://trac.macports.org/ticket/68854. I'll send in a PR to update libxfce4*, which should trigger a rebuild and therefore fox the issues.

[qwertychouskie]

PR opened: #23687

Once that PR is merged I'll rebase this one and it should work.

[qwertychouskie]

  DEBUG: system: /opt/local/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache -f -t /opt/local/share/icons/hicolor
  sh: /opt/local/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache: No such file or directory
  Command failed: /opt/local/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache -f -t /opt/local/share/icons/hicolor
  Exit code: 127
  Error: Failed to activate mousepad: command execution failed

Hmm, it works fine on my system, perhaps there's a missing dep/builddep?

[qwertychouskie]

OK, now it's failing locally as well. What's weird is that this build worked before the rebase on #23687...

[qwertychouskie]

Ah, it's because gtk2 is no longer installed, and gtk3's gtk-update-icon-cache is called gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0. On my Ubuntu system, the main gtk-update-icon-cache is built from the GTK3 sources. Perhaps the gtk2 version should be renamed to gtk-update-icon-cache-2.0, and the gtk3 version renamed to gtk-update-icon-cache? GTK2 is long deprecated, and the list of things still using it is shrinking over time. In fact, as I get to updating more XFCE stuff, that list is going to be even smaller.

@mascguy Since you maintain the GTK packages, what are your thoughts?

[ryandesign]

Perhaps the gtk2 version should be renamed to gtk-update-icon-cache-2.0, and the gtk3 version renamed to gtk-update-icon-cache?

And then update the references them all the ports and build systems that are already familiar with their existing names? Seems like a lot of work for no benefit.

[mascguy]

Perhaps the gtk2 version should be renamed to gtk-update-icon-cache-2.0, and the gtk3 version renamed to gtk-update-icon-cache?

And then update the references them all the ports and build systems that are already familiar with their existing names? Seems like a lot of work for no benefit.

That is my concern as well.

[mohd-akram]

IMO update this to use gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0 until we figure out what to do with #23731. The fewer GTK2 ports the easier any kind of transition would be.

[reneeotten]

feel free to reopen this PR once it's actually building.