This is a vendor-agnostic PHP implementation of NETCONF. I developed this so I could extend a Junos (Juniper) specific NETCONF API off of it, and decided to share it publicly.

• RFC6241 - Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6241
• RFC6242 - Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH) - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6242

• PHP >= 5.4
• phpseclib (https://github.com/phpseclib/phpseclib)

• Attributes for sendRaw need to be sanitized correctly (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6241)
• Elements with attribute naming for subtree filters need to be implemented ("6.4.8. Elements with Attribute Naming")
• Parse capabilities based on IANA list: https://www.iana.org/assignments/netconf-capability-urns/netconf-capability-urns.xhtml

$netConf = new NetConf(
    "192.168.0.100",
    new NetConfAuthPassword(
        [
            "username" => "lamoni",
            "password" => "phpsux"
        ]
    )
);

echo $netConf->sendRPC(
    "<get-config>".
        "<source>".
            "<running/>".
        "</source>".
    "</get-config>"
);

$netConf->editConfig(
    "<configuration>
        <interfaces>
            <interface>
                <name>fe-0/0/0</name>
                <description>Testing netconf</description>
            </interface>
        </interfaces>
    </configuration>",
    'candidate',
    ['custom-param' => 'custom-value']
);


if ($netConf->commit()->isRPCReplyOK()) {
    echo "Successfully committed, dude!";
}
else {
    echo "Something's wrong, man.";
}

$getUsersNames = $netConf->getConfig(
    [
       "configuration/system/login/user" => [
           [
               "name"=>"user"
           ]
       ]
    ]
);

• Namespaces?
• Heavier use of Exceptions?
• test-option: The element MAY be specified only if the device advertises the :validate:1.1 capability (Section 8.6).
• Should I be implicitly locking/unlocking the config for editConfig() () and commit() () calls?
• Should I remove the long list of arguments for argument-heavy methods and replace them with a single array?
  • Pros
    • it looks nicer
    • allows for extension in the future without requiring heavy refactoring
  • Cons
    • Methods will require some extract() type code at the top, along with validation of keys passed through (abstract class that?)
    • IDEs argument suggestion won't work(?)
• XPath capability in filter?