You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Message: On some systems (though not Linux-based systems) an attempt to free() results from memalign() may fail. This may, on a few systems, be exploitable. Also note that memalign() may not check that the boundary parameter is correct (CWE-676). Use posix_memalign instead (defined in POSIX's 1003.1d). Don't switch to valloc(); it is marked as obsolete in BSD 4.3, as legacy in SUSv2, and is no longer defined in SUSv3. In some cases, malloc()'s alignment may be sufficient.
johnsonjh
changed the title
On some systems (though not Linux-based systems) an attempt to free() results from memalign() may fail. This may, on a few systems, be exploitable. Also note that memalign() may not check that the boundary parameter is correct (CWE-676). Use posix_memalign instead (defined in POSIX's 1003.1d). Don't switch to valloc(); it is marked as obsolete in BSD 4.3, as legacy in SUSv2, and is no longer defined in SUSv3. In some cases, malloc()'s alignment may be sufficient.
memalign() may fail #2
Jun 10, 2021
Codacy detected an issue:
Message:
On some systems (though not Linux-based systems) an attempt to free() results from memalign() may fail. This may, on a few systems, be exploitable. Also note that memalign() may not check that the boundary parameter is correct (CWE-676). Use posix_memalign instead (defined in POSIX's 1003.1d). Don't switch to valloc(); it is marked as obsolete in BSD 4.3, as legacy in SUSv2, and is no longer defined in SUSv3. In some cases, malloc()'s alignment may be sufficient.
Currently on:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: