Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Timeout on doc build in CircleCI #1187

Closed
lesteve opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1189
Closed

Timeout on doc build in CircleCI #1187

lesteve opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1189

Comments

@lesteve
Copy link
Member

lesteve commented May 27, 2021

https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/joblib/joblib/385/workflows/c6781732-96fb-488d-aa07-3d9438c03c92/jobs/1639

First look at it seems to indicate that:

  • examples/compressors_comparison.py is to blame
  • the dataset download is to blame but I am not 100% sure ... certainly rerunning the example locally can take a very variable time 20s to a few minutes locally.

A possible work-around would be to try OpenML https://www.openml.org/d/1113 rather than https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/machine-learning-databases/kddcup99-mld/.

Downloading the 10% sampled dataset from OpenML rather than the full dataset from archive.ics.uci.edu and taking the first 1e6 with pandas (data = pd.read_csv(url, names=names, nrows=1e6)) results in a similar sized dataset ~160MB.

@lesteve
Copy link
Member Author

lesteve commented May 28, 2021

Hmmm I think this was a complete red herring ... it seems like something is fishy on CircleCI the doc build does not finish but it works fine on readthedocs e.g. the build on master from yesterday: https://readthedocs.org/projects/joblib/builds/13869831/

A pragmatic approach would be to drop CircleCI since it does not seem useful anymore, i.e. we can have doc build in PRs with readthedocs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant