Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Interaction between two different organs #140

Open
Yuwang-art opened this issue Apr 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Interaction between two different organs #140

Yuwang-art opened this issue Apr 22, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Yuwang-art
Copy link

Hi Dr. Jin,

I have single cell data from two different organs, A and B, respectively. I intend to find the ligand-receptor interaction pairings between the two organs. Therefore, I have directly merged the data sets from organ A and organ B together. Is this OK? Or is there a better way?

Furthermore, I am only concerned with ligand-receptor pairs where the ligand is in A and the receptor is in B (or where the ligand is in B and the receptor is in A), not ligand-receptor pairs where both the ligand and the receptor are in A (or both are in B). Thus, if a ligand is highly expressed in all cell types in organ A but less so in organ B, and its corresponding receptor is highly expressed in all cell types in organ B but less so in organ A, will this gene always be selected as a significant ligand-receptor pair because of the difference in expression in the two organs?

Thanks!

@rojweber
Copy link

I have a similar question. I am interested in hormones which are produced distantly and not captured in the data set of local ligands. What is the best way to handle ligands that come from the blood stream? Would it be to produce a 'synthetic' cluster that represents the blood stream and just put a list of ligands in there? Examples would be things like insulin or thyroid hormone.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants