Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: qBittorrent categories support? #81

Closed
runaroundhome opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Feature Request: qBittorrent categories support? #81

runaroundhome opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@runaroundhome
Copy link

Type: Feature Request

Summary

You've done amazing work on this since forking it (Thank you!!), so hate to ask for anything, but any plans on adding the categories for qBittorrent?

Idea of implementation

Not sure why qbt even has both tags and cats, I'd be happy with just an option to link cats to tags in flood, and ignore tags from qbt, but that's kinda a hack way about it.
I only ask about cats support because sonarr/radarr etc uses cats, and sometimes I manually add torrents and need to assign the sonarr category.

Not sure how easy it is to add a new filtering option.

@jesec
Copy link
Owner

jesec commented Nov 9, 2020

Categories in qBittorrent are exclusive. One torrent can only have one category. It is duplicative to have both tag and category. Other clients don't support categories, either.

As such, I don't think this feature can be implemented.

@jesec
Copy link
Owner

jesec commented Nov 9, 2020

The best way to solve the problem is to add Flood support to Sonarr/Radarr. It should be quite straightforward with the documented APIs of Flood. However, it does demand some experience in C#.

@runaroundhome
Copy link
Author

Hmmm, didn't think about going that route, will look into creating a DownloadClient for flood then. I've not used C# before, but how hard could it be..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants