Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement connecting multiple clusters with isolation and boundary protection, as defined by major industry standards. #16470

Closed
vadimeisenbergibm opened this issue Aug 22, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
area/environments area/networking feature/Multi-cluster issues related with multi-cluster support

Comments

@vadimeisenbergibm
Copy link
Contributor

vadimeisenbergibm commented Aug 22, 2019

Major industry standards require isolation and boundary protection:

  • put an access control mechanism at the boundary (firewall, gateway, etc.)
  • all the access control mechanisms must be deny-all by default
  • do not expose private IP addresses from the isolated environment
  • do not let components from outside the boundary to manage security inside the isolated environment

The three multi-cluster patterns as documented on istio.io do not provide isolation between clusters and their boundary protection.

A design document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jmOSRy8ZL1HOe5CLCSg_Ufw9UdhoCs9O4ysJcl2k6r4/edit#heading=h.7zgnj8bwqfld
A possible implementation: istio/istio.io#4776

@vadimeisenbergibm vadimeisenbergibm changed the title The current multi-cluster patterns on istio.io do not provide isolation and boundary protection, as defined by major industry standards. Implement connecting multiple clusters with isolation and boundary protection, as defined by major industry standards. Aug 22, 2019
@vadimeisenbergibm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@smawson @costinm @louiscryan @sdake @frankbu @andraxylia @nmittler @ayj @linsun I have created an epic to define the activity related to connecting multiple clusters with isolation & boundary protection.

@smawson
Copy link
Contributor

smawson commented Aug 22, 2019

Awesome, thank you Vadim!

@irisdingbj irisdingbj added the feature/Multi-cluster issues related with multi-cluster support label Mar 31, 2020
@howardjohn howardjohn added this to the Nebulous Future milestone Nov 19, 2020
@howardjohn howardjohn closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jul 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/environments area/networking feature/Multi-cluster issues related with multi-cluster support
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants