-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 171
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Training failure due to the scale difference between the offset and the canonical space gs. #166
Comments
yes of course, you can just change the initialization of the deformation field in L221 and L223. |
Yes, you can set different initialize level, but I think you can only modify L221. |
Open
thanks for your advice! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello,
Thanks for your great work. Have you ever encountered training failure due to the scale difference between the offset and the canonical space gs?
For example, the position range of the canonical space gs is [-0.2, 0.2], while the offset range output by the deformation model is [-1, 1]. So most of the gs will be deformed out of the camera's field of view, causing a large difference between the rendered image and the ground truth, making it impossible for the model to optimize properly.
Do you have any opinion on this issue?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: