Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Preferred thread network still there after uninstalling OTBR Add-on #3343

Closed
mpasdziernik opened this issue Dec 6, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed
Labels

Comments

@mpasdziernik
Copy link

Describe the issue you are experiencing

After uninstalling the OTBR add-on the created thread network "home assistant" is still the preferred network with reporting "no border routers found".

I would expect that the network gets removed or that I am able to remove it via the gui. It is unclear to me if this preferred network without router will cause any problems.

What type of installation are you running?

Home Assistant OS

Which operating system are you running on?

Home Assistant Operating System

Which add-on are you reporting an issue with?

OpenThread Border Router

What is the version of the add-on?

2.3.2

Steps to reproduce the issue

  1. Install add-on
  2. Start with SkyConnect device
  3. (optional) Delete corresponding integration
  4. Uninstall add-on
    ...

System Health information

System Information

version core-2023.11.3
installation_type Home Assistant OS
dev false
hassio true
docker true
user root
virtualenv false
python_version 3.11.6
os_name Linux
os_version 6.1.63-haos
arch x86_64
timezone Europe/Berlin
config_dir /config
Home Assistant Community Store
GitHub API ok
GitHub Content ok
GitHub Web ok
GitHub API Calls Remaining 4656
Installed Version 1.33.0
Stage running
Available Repositories 1345
Downloaded Repositories 13
Home Assistant Cloud
logged_in false
can_reach_cert_server ok
can_reach_cloud_auth ok
can_reach_cloud ok
Home Assistant Supervisor
host_os Home Assistant OS 11.2
update_channel stable
supervisor_version supervisor-2023.11.6
agent_version 1.6.0
docker_version 24.0.7
disk_total 30.8 GB
disk_used 8.2 GB
healthy true
supported true
board ova
supervisor_api ok
version_api ok
installed_addons File editor (5.7.0), Advanced SSH & Web Terminal (16.0.2), Mosquitto broker (6.4.0), Zigbee2MQTT (1.34.0-1), NGINX Home Assistant SSL proxy (3.5.0), Cloudflared (4.2.11), Whisper (1.0.0), Piper (1.4.0), openWakeWord (1.8.2), Matter Server (4.10.2)
Dashboards
dashboards 2
resources 9
views 4
mode storage
Recorder
oldest_recorder_run November 26, 2023 at 4:23 PM
current_recorder_run December 6, 2023 at 2:00 PM
estimated_db_size 269.13 MiB
database_engine sqlite
database_version 3.41.2

Anything in the Supervisor logs that might be useful for us?

No response

Anything in the add-on logs that might be useful for us?

No response

Additional information

Screenshot from 2023-12-06 09-28-55

@madmalkav
Copy link

Same here.

imagen

@mpasdziernik
Copy link
Author

It seems not to have any negative impact so far. New matter/thread devices can be added without problem and join the apple thread network "MyHome55".

That is what I want but it is unclear why Home Assistant now chooses this network and why they ignore the nanoleaf network "NanoleafThread35".

@rd-michael-pasdziernik
Copy link

With the new version of the IOS companion app I was able to import the apple thread network credentials and choose the apple network as the preferred network. After this it was possible to delete the home assistant network.

@madmalkav
Copy link

I can´t do that, I get error 74.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Feb 9, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Feb 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants