Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revise GVRS file format, is backward compatibility required? #27

Closed
gwlucastrig opened this issue Sep 30, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Revise GVRS file format, is backward compatibility required? #27

gwlucastrig opened this issue Sep 30, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@gwlucastrig
Copy link
Owner

I am considering a series of changes to clean up the file format for the Gridfour Virtual Raster Store (GVRS, formerly G93). If I make these changes, they will break backward compatibility with existing files. I am trying to assess the impact this change will have on existing users.

As far as I know, GVRS has not yet established a user base. While this situation is a personal disappointment, it has the advantage that I can proceed with format changes without a negative impact on anyone else's work (something about which I am very concerned).

If you have been working with GVRS files, please let me know so that the Gridfour project can continue to support you.

Thanks,

Gary

P.S. This topic was mentioned in an earlier issue at

#26

@gwlucastrig
Copy link
Owner Author

GVRS updated to 1.0.4. The API will support pre-1.0.4 versions on a read-only basis. This feature may be retired in future releases.

Version 1.0.4 is considered a stable version of the GVRS format.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant