Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: turn off storing content or change the bookmark links #210

Closed
imtbl opened this issue Nov 3, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed
Labels
type:enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@imtbl
Copy link

imtbl commented Nov 3, 2019

Somewhat related to #203, see my last comment there in particular.

It would be great to have an option to either turn off storing a copy of the plaintext content of a page altogether (the one that is apparently always stored if possible, not the archive, which is optional already) or to change the links on the bookmarks so the image and main title will always link to the original URL.

I think the way it's currently linked (the image and main title linking to the stored content/archive) is not ideal especially on mobile devices where clicking the original URL below is a bit of a pain. I would rather just link the two icons to stored content/archive respectively and everything else to the original URL. It's usually my intent to view the original, unless it's no longer available, in which case I'll fall back to the stored content/archive. This could also be optional, I guess, if people prefer it the way it currently is.

@deanishe
Copy link
Contributor

deanishe commented Aug 7, 2020

change the links on the bookmarks so the image and main title will always link to the original URL.

Probably this. Or make the original link easier to click/tap.

@deanishe deanishe added the type:enhancement New feature or request label Aug 7, 2020
@go-shiori go-shiori locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 5, 2022
@fmartingr fmartingr converted this issue into discussion #335 Feb 5, 2022

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
type:enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants