Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Add webhook for the matrix protocol #6590

Closed
pinpox opened this issue Apr 12, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

[Feature Request] Add webhook for the matrix protocol #6590

pinpox opened this issue Apr 12, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.

Comments

@pinpox
Copy link

pinpox commented Apr 12, 2019

Under "Webhooks" in the admin or repo-settings page there are currently a few options for webhooks. It would be great to have one for matrix too, as it is probably not too hard to implement and would allow to forward to a lot of different protocols via the existing bridges too.

Is this someting you would consider merging? If so, I would give it a go and submit a pull requst.
EDIT: This might be another way of implementing this: https://t2bot.io/webhooks/

@lunny lunny added the type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first. label Apr 13, 2019
@savyajha
Copy link

Fwiw, this sounds really good. I don't have the chops to pull it off, but if it gets through I'd be massively thankful.

@pinpox
Copy link
Author

pinpox commented Apr 15, 2019

In the meantime, I'm building a matrix bot to work around it. You can find it on my repos, but be warnend, it's not functional yet, work-in-progress.

@mrsdizzie
Copy link
Member

Added in #10831

@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants