-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make regression issues queryable in issue platform #71031
Labels
Comments
Routing to @getsentry/product-owners-issues for triage ⏲️ |
@cathteng can you store the data you want to query on in the evidence? cc @JoshFerge |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Problem Statement
We would like to add function regression issues (and possibly other regression issues) to open PR comments.
Currently, the issue platform (the
search_issues
dataset in Snuba) supports querying for normal issues, but regression issues also have information in the occurrence that would be useful for querying like the file and function, and other information that would be useful to know about like the subtitle (e.g.Duration increased from 510.82ms to 791.56ms (P95)
). These fields are currently stored in theoccurrence
, which is stored in nodestore.TL;DR The issue platform has an
occurrence_id
field that points to the occurrence, but could we pull out some fields from the occurrence itself and store it directly in the table?There may also be other use cases for this !
Solution Brainstorm
No response
Product Area
Issues
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: