You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Name: Lizzie Lundgren
Institution: Harvard University
Description of your issue or question
The January monthly diagnostic of a MERRA2 benchmark after starting Jan 1 2019 contains all constant values of 1.00000640e-07 mol/mol up through the stratosphere. Running the simulation to get daily mean values for the same diagnostic shows heterogeneity with range 99.9990001 to 99.9990025 ppb in the zonal mean on various days, including day 1 and day 31. The daily means correspond well with restart files which have the same range for zonal mean.
Day 1 and Day 31 daily means, zonal mean:
Jan 1 and Feb 1 restart files, zonal mean:
I am creating this issue because it is strange the monthly diagnostic does not reflect what we see in the restart files and daily means. Is there a bug here? If it is a bug then it is not new to the latest version. Here is an example of the issue in the 14.2.0 benchmark. Notice that the GC-Classic diagnostic value matches what we see in the GCHP restart files and daily mean diagnostic. The GCHP constant value, however, is higher, and does not match the same pattern.
Full column zonal mean for Jan:
Surface mean for Jan:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Note that this issue does not impact assessment of mass conservation in the transport tracer benchmark since we use restart files for the mass time series.
Name and Institution (Required)
Name: Lizzie Lundgren
Institution: Harvard University
Description of your issue or question
The January monthly diagnostic of a MERRA2 benchmark after starting Jan 1 2019 contains all constant values of 1.00000640e-07 mol/mol up through the stratosphere. Running the simulation to get daily mean values for the same diagnostic shows heterogeneity with range 99.9990001 to 99.9990025 ppb in the zonal mean on various days, including day 1 and day 31. The daily means correspond well with restart files which have the same range for zonal mean.
Day 1 and Day 31 daily means, zonal mean:
Jan 1 and Feb 1 restart files, zonal mean:
I am creating this issue because it is strange the monthly diagnostic does not reflect what we see in the restart files and daily means. Is there a bug here? If it is a bug then it is not new to the latest version. Here is an example of the issue in the 14.2.0 benchmark. Notice that the GC-Classic diagnostic value matches what we see in the GCHP restart files and daily mean diagnostic. The GCHP constant value, however, is higher, and does not match the same pattern.
Full column zonal mean for Jan:
![Screen Shot 2024-04-04 at 1 16 03 PM](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/651947/319703612-42945290-95cf-4c68-8191-1abb305f5b81.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3MjQwMTkzNzQsIm5iZiI6MTcyNDAxOTA3NCwicGF0aCI6Ii82NTE5NDcvMzE5NzAzNjEyLTQyOTQ1MjkwLTk1Y2YtNGM2OC04MTkxLTFhYmIzMDVmNWI4MS5wbmc_WC1BbXotQWxnb3JpdGhtPUFXUzQtSE1BQy1TSEEyNTYmWC1BbXotQ3JlZGVudGlhbD1BS0lBVkNPRFlMU0E1M1BRSzRaQSUyRjIwMjQwODE4JTJGdXMtZWFzdC0xJTJGczMlMkZhd3M0X3JlcXVlc3QmWC1BbXotRGF0ZT0yMDI0MDgxOFQyMjExMTRaJlgtQW16LUV4cGlyZXM9MzAwJlgtQW16LVNpZ25hdHVyZT02ZmM4NDUyNTNmZjAzMGM4NTQ0MGUyODEwY2I3NzM0Y2ZlOTdhMmRjMzc4ZjZiNzYzODg1M2JiMDhkMzhjNGI2JlgtQW16LVNpZ25lZEhlYWRlcnM9aG9zdCZhY3Rvcl9pZD0wJmtleV9pZD0wJnJlcG9faWQ9MCJ9.4msoaZ89mBItoSAeHweTebWD-RxksIXQA0RBSkSC_Y8)
Surface mean for Jan:
![Screen Shot 2024-04-04 at 1 17 11 PM](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/651947/319704055-1a4febeb-511f-4cf5-bec6-866c27108ba8.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3MjQwMTkzNzQsIm5iZiI6MTcyNDAxOTA3NCwicGF0aCI6Ii82NTE5NDcvMzE5NzA0MDU1LTFhNGZlYmViLTUxMWYtNGNmNS1iZWM2LTg2NmMyNzEwOGJhOC5wbmc_WC1BbXotQWxnb3JpdGhtPUFXUzQtSE1BQy1TSEEyNTYmWC1BbXotQ3JlZGVudGlhbD1BS0lBVkNPRFlMU0E1M1BRSzRaQSUyRjIwMjQwODE4JTJGdXMtZWFzdC0xJTJGczMlMkZhd3M0X3JlcXVlc3QmWC1BbXotRGF0ZT0yMDI0MDgxOFQyMjExMTRaJlgtQW16LUV4cGlyZXM9MzAwJlgtQW16LVNpZ25hdHVyZT0yMTUzNDJjNDRiYzRmZjBiODQ4YjJiMWU0NTgzYTIxYjc1NTEyMWI2ODM5MWNkOWVhOTY0ODNiNTU5N2E4OTBkJlgtQW16LVNpZ25lZEhlYWRlcnM9aG9zdCZhY3Rvcl9pZD0wJmtleV9pZD0wJnJlcG9faWQ9MCJ9.prXCvGxngUvZ3y6uL9wVG_yqoUjPH8kQtm-IEMRMc0c)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: