Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Obsoletion request: barbed-end actin filament capping (GO:0051016) actin filament capping (GO:0051693) pointed-end actin filament capping (GO:0051694) #28151

Open
26 tasks
ValWood opened this issue Jun 15, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor

ValWood commented Jun 15, 2024

Please provide as much information as you can:

Follow on from #22594

pointed-end actin filament capping (GO:0051694)
barbed-end actin filament capping (GO:0051016)
actin filament capping (GO:0051693)

The binding of a protein or protein complex to the end of an actin filament, thus preventing the addition, exchange or removal of further actin subunits. [ISBN:071673706X]

currently a child of regulation of actin polymerization

migrate annotations to NEW Molecular function terms where appropriate
GONEW actin filament cap activity
GONEW actin filament barbed end cap activity
GONEW actin filament pointed end cap activity

However note that there are erroneous annotations.

Formins should not have been annotated to
barbed-end actin filament capping (GO:0051016)
and should not be annotated to the new MF terms

because their purpose is not "preventing the addition, exchange or removal of further actin subunits"

  • GO term ID and Label

  • Reason for deprecation Put an x in the appropriate box:

  • The reason for obsoletion is that the term is not clearly defined and usage has been inconsistent.
  • The reason for obsoletion is that this term is pre-composed and should be represented as a GO-CAM model.
  • The reason for obsoletion is that this term represent an assay and not a GO process.
  • The reason for obsoletion is that this represents a phenotype.
  • The reason for obsoletion is that the data from the paper for which the term was requested can be accurately described using [appropriate GO term].
  • The reason for obsoletion is that this term represents a molecular function.
  • The reason for obsoletion is that this term represents a gene product.
  • The reason for obsoletion is that this term refers to a class of proteins.
  • The reason for obsoletion is that this term was added in error.
  • The reason for obsoletion is that more specific terms were created.
  • The reason for obsoletion is that this term was an unnecessary grouping term.
  • The reason for obsoletion is that the meaning of the term is ambiguous.
  • The reason for obsoletion is that is not known to be catalyzed by any gene product.
  • The reason for obsoletion is that it more specific than the specificity of any known gene product.
  • The reason for obsoletion is that there is no evidence that this function/process/component exists.
  • "Replace by" term (ID and label)
    If all annotations can safely be moved to that term

  • "Consider" term(s) (ID and label)
    Suggestions for reannotation

  • Are there annotations to this term?

  • How many EXP:
  • Are there mappings and cross references to this term? (InterPro, Keywords; check QuickGO cross-references section)

  • Is this term in a subset? (check the AmiGO page for that term)

  • Any other information


Checklist for ontology editor

Check term usage and metadata in Protégé

  • check term usage in the ontology
  • check internal mappings: RHEA, EC, MetaCyc
  • check subset usage
  • check taxon constraints

Check annotations

Notification

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jun 15, 2024

@pgaudet does this sound OK?

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jun 15, 2024

from #19107
Is the correct solution to restore

GO:0003782
obsolete F-actin capping activity
?

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Jun 18, 2024

It's certainly an option -
what process should these gees be annotated to? actin cytoskeleton organization?

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jun 24, 2024

Current parentage:

Screenshot 2024-06-24 at 14 34 55

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Aug 7, 2024

I'm a bit confused by the CC term "actin cap"

GO:0030478 actin cap
Polarized accumulation of cytoskeletal proteins (including F-actin) and regulatory proteins in a cell.
?

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Aug 7, 2024

ignore. This CC "actin cap" is unrelated to "actin capping"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants