Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

solver bug - evaluation of alternate resources at incorrect dates #494

Open
jdetaeye opened this issue Feb 13, 2022 Discussed in #493 · 4 comments
Open

solver bug - evaluation of alternate resources at incorrect dates #494

jdetaeye opened this issue Feb 13, 2022 Discussed in #493 · 4 comments

Comments

@jdetaeye
Copy link
Member

Discussed in #493

Originally posted by tjheiska February 11, 2022
Hello,

In attached example data I have two sales orders that are both going to be late. The one with higher priority is started as early as possible, but the second one is not. Any idea what am I doing wrong with modeling as there should be plenty of resources left?

frepple-20220211055538.log
frepple (3).xlsx)

@jdetaeye
Copy link
Member Author

Quick analysis: Switching resource to alternates isn't following the requested ask date.

@tjheiska
Copy link
Contributor

What is the priority of this? I think this as quite severe bug since it's causing orders already being late to be even more late.

@jdetaeye
Copy link
Member Author

jdetaeye commented Feb 23, 2022

You're welcome to send a pull request with the fix. :-)

Don't expect the frepple team to work automatically & for free to respect the timelines and critical issues of your project.
As a user of the Community Edition, please read https://frepple.com/blog/community-edition-vs-enterprise-edition/ to understand what kind of "priority" your issue gets...
I'm sorry if I can't hide my disappointment on comments like this.

@tjheiska
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, you could have just said that the enterprise edition is not suffering that bug and it's getting low priority. Not very good advertisement for your product.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants