build(deps-dev): Bump esbuild from 0.17.7 to 0.17.8

[dependabot]

Bumps esbuild from 0.17.7 to 0.17.8.

Release notes

Sourced from esbuild's releases.

v0.17.8

• Fix a minification bug with non-ASCII identifiers (#2910)

  This release fixes a bug with esbuild where non-ASCII identifiers followed by a keyword were incorrectly not separated by a space. This bug affected both the in and instanceof keywords. Here's an example of the fix:

  // Original code
  π in a
  // Old output (with --minify --charset=utf8)
  πin a;
  // New output (with --minify --charset=utf8)
  π in a;

• Fix a regression with esbuild's WebAssembly API in version 0.17.6 (#2911)

  Version 0.17.6 of esbuild updated the Go toolchain to version 1.20.0. This had the unfortunate side effect of increasing the amount of stack space that esbuild uses (presumably due to some changes to Go's WebAssembly implementation) which could cause esbuild's WebAssembly-based API to crash with a stack overflow in cases where it previously didn't crash. One such case is the package grapheme-splitter which contains code that looks like this:

  if (
    (0x0300 <= code && code <= 0x036F) ||
    (0x0483 <= code && code <= 0x0487) ||
    (0x0488 <= code && code <= 0x0489) ||
    (0x0591 <= code && code <= 0x05BD) ||
    // ... many hundreds of lines later ...
  ) {
    return;
  }

  This edge case involves a chain of binary operators that results in an AST over 400 nodes deep. Normally this wouldn't be a problem because Go has growable call stacks, so the call stack would just grow to be as large as needed. However, WebAssembly byte code deliberately doesn't expose the ability to manipulate the stack pointer, so Go's WebAssembly translation is forced to use the fixed-size WebAssembly call stack. So esbuild's WebAssembly implementation is vulnerable to stack overflow in cases like these.

  It's not unreasonable for this to cause a stack overflow, and for esbuild's answer to this problem to be "don't write code like this." That's how many other AST-manipulation tools handle this problem. However, it's possible to implement AST traversal using iteration instead of recursion to work around limited call stack space. This version of esbuild implements this code transformation for esbuild's JavaScript parser and printer, so esbuild's WebAssembly implementation is now able to process the grapheme-splitter package (at least when compiled with Go 1.20.0 and run with node's WebAssembly implementation).

Changelog

Sourced from esbuild's changelog.

0.17.8

• Fix a minification bug with non-ASCII identifiers (#2910)

  This release fixes a bug with esbuild where non-ASCII identifiers followed by a keyword were incorrectly not separated by a space. This bug affected both the in and instanceof keywords. Here's an example of the fix:

  // Original code
  π in a
  // Old output (with --minify --charset=utf8)
  πin a;
  // New output (with --minify --charset=utf8)
  π in a;

• Fix a regression with esbuild's WebAssembly API in version 0.17.6 (#2911)

  Version 0.17.6 of esbuild updated the Go toolchain to version 1.20.0. This had the unfortunate side effect of increasing the amount of stack space that esbuild uses (presumably due to some changes to Go's WebAssembly implementation) which could cause esbuild's WebAssembly-based API to crash with a stack overflow in cases where it previously didn't crash. One such case is the package grapheme-splitter which contains code that looks like this:

  if (
    (0x0300 <= code && code <= 0x036F) ||
    (0x0483 <= code && code <= 0x0487) ||
    (0x0488 <= code && code <= 0x0489) ||
    (0x0591 <= code && code <= 0x05BD) ||
    // ... many hundreds of lines later ...
  ) {
    return;
  }

  This edge case involves a chain of binary operators that results in an AST over 400 nodes deep. Normally this wouldn't be a problem because Go has growable call stacks, so the call stack would just grow to be as large as needed. However, WebAssembly byte code deliberately doesn't expose the ability to manipulate the stack pointer, so Go's WebAssembly translation is forced to use the fixed-size WebAssembly call stack. So esbuild's WebAssembly implementation is vulnerable to stack overflow in cases like these.

  It's not unreasonable for this to cause a stack overflow, and for esbuild's answer to this problem to be "don't write code like this." That's how many other AST-manipulation tools handle this problem. However, it's possible to implement AST traversal using iteration instead of recursion to work around limited call stack space. This version of esbuild implements this code transformation for esbuild's JavaScript parser and printer, so esbuild's WebAssembly implementation is now able to process the grapheme-splitter package (at least when compiled with Go 1.20.0 and run with node's WebAssembly implementation).

Commits

• 5e0b1cd publish 0.17.8 to npm
• 93a5497 also use iteration to print binary ops (#2911)
• 5d4f511 move binary expr visiting into visitBinaryExpr
• 33daf46 fix #2911: use iteration to visit binary op nodes
• 3b8fc34 move binary expr visiting into visitBinaryExpr
• 1db6e12 fix #2910: minify+non-ASCII names before a keyword
• See full diff in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[flexdevelopment]

lgtm 👍🏾

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #135 (35765b0) into main (75b5d22) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 35765b0 differs from pull request most recent head 3516bf4. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3516bf4 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #135   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           65        65           
  Lines         5048      5048           
  Branches       461       461           
=========================================
  Hits          5048      5048           

Flag	Coverage Δ
node14	100.00% <ø> (ø)
node16	100.00% <ø> (ø)
node18	100.00% <ø> (ø)
node19	100.00% <ø> (ø)

Components	Coverage Δ
internal	100.00% <ø> (ø)
utils	100.00% <ø> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 97dfd0a...3516bf4. Read the comment docs.

[unicornware]

@dependabot rebase

[dependabot]

Looks like this PR is already up-to-date with main! If you'd still like to recreate it from scratch, overwriting any edits, you can request @dependabot recreate.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent
activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs or features. Be
sure to reference this issue.