You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like the euler parameter (degree, translation) to be the same convention between the 2 transform : Motion and Affine
I know that this is not a real problem (to have different convention) because if one only use the Random version having a change in x or y or even a swap between x and y would not matter (because you randomly parse [-alpha +alpha] with the same range in all 3 directions (x,y,z)
But for consistency, I think it should be the same, and for more advance use it may becomes important
I just open the issue in case you could easily find the discrepency. (but for me this is quickly a nightmare this itk conventions issues ... I had hard time to solve it for my motion implementation ...)
I expect the motion image should be a mixt of tissue comming from the original position and from the new position (colin_affin.nii)
but I clearly see it is not the case
(Actually I compare with an other implementation of motion (the PR is comming soon ) and as both should produce the same artefact (for the same transient affine displacement) I notice it is not the case.
Error messages
No response
Expected outcome
I could add screen shot to show the problem but not sure if it helps ...
System info
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is there an existing issue for this?
Problem summary
I would like the euler parameter (degree, translation) to be the same convention between the 2 transform : Motion and Affine
I know that this is not a real problem (to have different convention) because if one only use the Random version having a change in x or y or even a swap between x and y would not matter (because you randomly parse [-alpha +alpha] with the same range in all 3 directions (x,y,z)
But for consistency, I think it should be the same, and for more advance use it may becomes important
I just open the issue in case you could easily find the discrepency. (but for me this is quickly a nightmare this itk conventions issues ... I had hard time to solve it for my motion implementation ...)
Code for reproduction
Actual outcome
I expect the motion image should be a mixt of tissue comming from the original position and from the new position (colin_affin.nii)
but I clearly see it is not the case
(Actually I compare with an other implementation of motion (the PR is comming soon ) and as both should produce the same artefact (for the same transient affine displacement) I notice it is not the case.
Error messages
No response
Expected outcome
I could add screen shot to show the problem but not sure if it helps ...
System info
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: