Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

XTCP 比 TCP 更耗资源吗? #4304

Closed
11 tasks
hzqim opened this issue Jun 26, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
11 tasks

XTCP 比 TCP 更耗资源吗? #4304

hzqim opened this issue Jun 26, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@hzqim
Copy link

hzqim commented Jun 26, 2024

Bug Description

使用DOCKER部署,在相同的机器,相同的时间段走 IPV6, 看同一个在线视频,XTCP没有添加压缩选项,TCP的速度几乎是XTCP的两倍,在后台观察到TCP模式下 CPU 使用率在 13% 左右浮动,而XTCP的CPU使用率大约是 35%.

frpc Version

0.58.1

frps Version

0.58.1

System Architecture

SERVER/Debian/amd64, CLIENT/OpenWRT/arm64

Configurations

这是 XTCP 协议固有的缺点吗?比如 NAT 开销,但 IPV6 应该不用 NAT?

Logs

No response

Steps to reproduce

...

Affected area

  • Docs
  • Installation
  • Performance and Scalability
  • Security
  • User Experience
  • Test and Release
  • Developer Infrastructure
  • Client Plugin
  • Server Plugin
  • Extensions
  • Others
@wuai1024
Copy link

ipv6 我理解是可以直连的啊。目前我用了很多 xtcp 没有测试过性能问题。

@xqzr
Copy link

xqzr commented Jun 28, 2024

xtcp 访问端和客户端之间连接,使用 QUIC(基于 UDP)

@fatedier fatedier closed this as completed Jul 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants