You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think the issue reported here(#22521) is still happening. If you click the red and green boxes listed vertically and quickly, the green box's onClick event is ignored and the red onClick event is called twice. However, using the onTouchEnd event instead of the onClick event does not cause any problems.
As reported in the issue(#22521), the onClick event works normally in the vanilla js environment.
Thank you for taking a look :)
RPReplay_Final1711377319.MP4
The expected behavior
The onClick event of an element clicked by the user must be called correctly. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been automatically marked as stale. If this issue is still affecting you, please leave any comment (for example, "bump"), and we'll keep it open. We are sorry that we haven't been able to prioritize it yet. If you have any new additional information, please include it with your comment!
Closing this issue after a prolonged period of inactivity. If this issue is still present in the latest release, please create a new issue with up-to-date information. Thank you!
React version: 18.2.0
Steps To Reproduce
Link to code example: https://stackblitz-starters-3edcyj.stackblitz.io/
The current behavior
I think the issue reported here(#22521) is still happening. If you click the red and green boxes listed vertically and quickly, the green box's onClick event is ignored and the red onClick event is called twice. However, using the onTouchEnd event instead of the onClick event does not cause any problems.
As reported in the issue(#22521), the onClick event works normally in the vanilla js environment.
Thank you for taking a look :)
RPReplay_Final1711377319.MP4
The expected behavior
The onClick event of an element clicked by the user must be called correctly. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: