Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add the option to allow experimental features in n/no-unsupported-features/node-builtins #199

Closed
scagood opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #269
Closed

Add the option to allow experimental features in n/no-unsupported-features/node-builtins #199

scagood opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #269
Labels
enhancement help wanted

Comments

@scagood
Copy link

scagood commented Mar 8, 2024

I am already loving the new builtin warnings, but I have realised that I want to allow all experimental features 👀

image

We do have the ignores option no-unsupported-features/node-builtins.md#ignores, but I think it'd be great to add an allowExperimental option.
@jlarmstrongiv
Copy link

Most of my rule failures are from experimental features:

Error:   28:18  error  The 'URL.createObjectURL' is still an experimental feature The configured version range is '20.12.2'  n/no-unsupported-features/node-builtins
Error:   29:26  error  The 'node:stream.Readable.fromWeb' is still an experimental feature The configured version range is '20.12.2'  n/no-unsupported-features/node-builtins
Error:   18:38  error  'promise-withresolvers' is not supported in Node.js. The configured version range is '20.12.2'  n/no-unsupported-features/es-syntax

@scagood scagood mentioned this issue May 8, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement help wanted
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

feat: Add support for ignoring experemental features scagood/eslint-plugin-n
2 participants
@scagood @jlarmstrongiv