Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

combine options for additional node placement #446

Open
olwijn opened this issue Nov 12, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

combine options for additional node placement #446

olwijn opened this issue Nov 12, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@olwijn
Copy link
Collaborator

olwijn commented Nov 12, 2021

There are currently 2 options for placement of additional nodes:
concave_hull (under data_source) - From the manual: "When true, the bounding boxes of the gridcells of the original reservoir model are used to check if the generated additional nodes are positioned within the reservoir volume."
place_nodes_in_volume_reservoir (directly under flownet) - From the manual: "When set to true the boundary of reservoir/layer volumes will be used as bounding volumes to place initial candidates instead of using the convex hull of well perforations. Currently requires an input reservoir simulation model."
The difference or interaction between the two options is not entirely clear from the manual. The description for the concave_hull option seems incorrect: it defines a volume based on well node locations only. Since both options affect the placement of additional nodes it seems logical to combine these into a single option, e.g. "placement_of_nodes" with valid values "concave_hull" and "reservoir_volume". From the config parser code it is not clear which option is used as default.

@olwijn olwijn added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Nov 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant