Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorporate auxillary information into API #2683

Closed
marcelstoer opened this issue Mar 16, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed

Incorporate auxillary information into API #2683

marcelstoer opened this issue Mar 16, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@marcelstoer
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Feature request: the RHBQ information on https://endoflife.date/quarkus-framework is not available through the API at https://endoflife.date/api/quarkus-framework.json.

Describe the solution you'd like
I don't know how this could be structured best but it'd certainly be helpful if this information were available in the API. This would give https://github.com/hugovk/norwegianblue a chance to also render it.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Scraping the web UI 😜

Additional context
n/a

@marcelstoer marcelstoer added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 16, 2023
@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Mar 16, 2023

Thank you for opening your first issue here 👍. Be sure to follow the issue template if you chose one.

@captn3m0
Copy link
Member

The RHBQ column comes from the extended Support field in the product YAML.

It is published in the API as extendedSupport, with the same semantics as the support/eol column (true/false/date). https://endoflife.date/api/quarkus-framework.json

image

We are working towards a v1 API in #2080 that should make more data accessible programmatically. (Feedback appreciated, here is the preview of the Quarkus API response).

@marcelstoer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks

@adriens
Copy link
Contributor

adriens commented Mar 16, 2023

BTW @captn3m0 , can you confirm me that the current API will not be dropped as soon as the v1 will be released ?

@captn3m0
Copy link
Member

Yes, see discussion at #2066, and this discussion on the v1 PR where consensus is currently on 1 year of guarantee.

@adriens
Copy link
Contributor

adriens commented Mar 16, 2023

Yes, see discussion at #2066, and this discussion on the v1 PR where consensus is currently on 1 year of guarantee.

Great, so it will let me time to migrate data integration to the new API 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants